@article{oai:konan-wu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000969,
 author = {門野, 里栄子},
 issue = {42},
 journal = {甲南女子大学研究紀要. 人間科学編, Studies in human sciences},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {110004868209, The purpose of this paper is to explore the way in which artificial reproductive technology (ART) has been accepted from the perspective of the "modern family" norm. It is no longer effective to measure the degree of acceptance of ART according to the distance from "natural reproduction". In some surveys, the acceptance of ART is based on "familyhood". In this paper, seven elements were drawn from the characteristics of the "modern family", and the degree of acceptance of ART was examined from its sufficiency with regard to these elements. The point of this acceptance lies in the difference between married couples and non-married couples. Two points have emerged as a result of this research. One is that the use of ART does not fundamentally conflict with the norm or idea of a husband-and-wife relationship. The other is that there is a conspicuous difference in the degree of acceptance of ART between married couples and non-married couples. In the latter case, this difference has already been pointed out. However, substitute pregnancy and other kinds of ART for non-married couples are fundamentally of the same type, from the perspective of the elements of the "modern family". From this point of view, every ART forms the subtype of the "modern family". Furthermore, from the mutual relation between elements, it is suggested that an infertile husband and wife probably accept the use of ART, since they believe that the "tie of blood" guarantees "bonds between parents and children by love". This is because the love norm requires the basis of a love relationship between parent and child to be "being a family" and the basis of "being a family" is attributed to the "real child principle" inherited from the Meiji Civil Code.},
 pages = {53--62},
 title = {生殖技術の受容と<近代家族>の構成要素},
 year = {2006}
}