ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 大学紀要
  2. 甲南女子大学研究紀要I

The Subjective/Objective Case Distinction, with Special Reference to Eighteenth-century Fictional Prose

https://konan-wu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/804
https://konan-wu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/804
11ae4926-daea-43d1-b95d-6d755b37ec6c
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
/ 039-04 (1.3 MB)
Item type Journal Article(1)
公開日 2024-05-27
タイトル
タイトル The Subjective/Objective Case Distinction, with Special Reference to Eighteenth-century Fictional Prose
タイトル
タイトル The Subjective/Objective Case Distinction, with Special Reference to Eighteenth-century Fictional Prose
言語 en
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ journal article
作成者 浮網, 佳代子

× 浮網, 佳代子

浮網, 佳代子

Search repository
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 110001045528
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 This paper is an attempt to describe characteristic usage in the choice between subjective and objective forms of personal pronouns, and also in the variation between who and whom in non-subject functions. The analysis of eighteenth-century fictional prose involves some stylistic interpretation, and also shows us actual usage in literary writings of the period. Variant forms such as than I/me, between/lev'saw you and I and it's I/me do not take on different meanings respectively, but reflect authors' attitudes towards the distinction between usage levels : educated or vulgar use. The isolated use of pronouns like I/Me!/? has negative or interjectional implications. As for the distinction between who and whom in non-subject functions, whom is much more preferred in writing. Our findings in Evelina correspond with the notion that who is closely associated with spoken style and whom with written style ; there is a higher frequency of whom in description and of who in dialogue.
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 This paper is an attempt to describe characteristic usage in the choice between subjective and objective forms of personal pronouns, and also in the variation between who and whom in non-subject functions. The analysis of eighteenth-century fictional prose involves some stylistic interpretation, and also shows us actual usage in literary writings of the period. Variant forms such as than I/me, between/lev'saw you and I and it's I/me do not take on different meanings respectively, but reflect authors' attitudes towards the distinction between usage levels : educated or vulgar use. The isolated use of pronouns like I/Me!/? has negative or interjectional implications. As for the distinction between who and whom in non-subject functions, whom is much more preferred in writing. Our findings in Evelina correspond with the notion that who is closely associated with spoken style and whom with written style ; there is a higher frequency of whom in description and of who in dialogue.
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AA11639907
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 1347121X
書誌情報
発行日 2003-03-18 甲南女子大学研究紀要. 文学・文化編
en : Konan Women's University researches of literature and culture volume

号 39
p. 23
p. 32
言語
言語 eng
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2024-04-01 05:21:33.478739
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3